.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Diagnostic Yield, Safety, And Efficacy Of Push Ent

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Diagnostic yield, guard, and ef?cacy of push enteroscopy in pediatrics Anil Darbari, MD, Anthony N. K every last(predicate)(a)oo, MD, Carmen Cuffari, MD Baltimore, Maryland, USA Background: charge enteroscopy has non been compared to tired endoscopy in children. neutral: The aim of this study was to envision the feasibility of push enteroscopy in children with suspect proximal footling catgut disease, and to compare its symptomatic yield and safety with standard endoscopy. Design/Setting: Database review. Patients: A database analysis was performed on all children who underwent push enteroscopy at The Johns Hopkins Childrens Center from 2001 to 2005. Patient demographics, clinical history, and indication for push enteroscopy were all recorded. Clinical utility was quali?ed based on the in?uence of PE on therapy. Main force Measurements: Diagnostic yield and safety of push enteroscopy in children. Results: campaign enteroscopy was performed on 44 chi ldren (27 M; 17 F) with a median age (range) of 10 (2-18) years. The some common indications for push enteroscopy were suspect proximal small catgut disease based on radiological criteria (21), and bleeding (9).
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Push enteroscopy con?rmed the diagnosis of proximal small bowel Crohns disease (CD) in 23, polyps in 5, eosinophilic gastroenteritis in 4, celiac disease in 1, microvillous inclusion disease in 1, and lymphoproliferative disease in 1 patient. An isolated non-Crohns associate gastric (1) and jejunal ulcer (1) was also identi?ed. Just 9 of these identi? adequate lesions were within reach by esophagogastroduo denoscopy (EGD). Seven patients had a gener! al push enteroscopy. The clinical trouble was modi?ed in 34 patients. Push enteroscopy was not shown to signi?cantly shorten the time of procedure when compared to EGD. Conclusions: Push enteroscopy is a safe symptomatic tool with proven clinical utility in children with suspected proximal small bowel disease. Larger studies are necessary to establish the widespread...If you want to bind a full essay, coordinate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment