incas vs. pizzaro

In the clash between the Incas and Francisco Pizarro the Europeans had the upper hand. His group had more(prenominal) sophisticated weapons and they had horses. Th e weapons helped them conquer the Incas because the were stronger than the spears the Incas had. Its cast of like making a person with a catapult verse someone with a canon. The battle was extremely unfair. as well the Europeans had horses. This enabled them to carry more supplies and go farther distances without get downting as tired. Another aspect of the horse is that none of the Incas had ever seen a horse before. This scared them to see such a large(p) animal with such great power. Also the Europeans carried many diseases to the raw(a) world. The Europeans were repellent to these diseases because they had grown up with and nearly them. However the Incas had neer been around the diseases before so they were very easily infected. most of theses diseases were from animals which the Incas had leave to be own there own or else of existence next to them during the day and sleeping with them at night. The diseases chop-chop massacreed or infected more than half the population in the peeled world.

Fin eachy, the Incas had the upper hand in one spot. They had on the whole of the resources that the Europeans wanted. With out the help form the Incas the Europeans would have gone informal empty handed. In this focal point the Europeans saw this and quick devised a way to get what they wanted. They devised a plan to do a surprise attack on the Incas. They killed many Incas and captured their leader. They did not kill ! their leader because they would get him to telll his people to get the Europeans what they wanted. In this way the Europeans took the only advantage the Incas had away from them.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper