Plato- The Republic

Though Socrates himself admits some failure in his attempt to side justice , the argument he has with Thrasymachus in the first concur of Plato s Republic demonstrates the superiority of Socrates over Thrasymachus as a soul . Yet , the comparative nature of the status superior leads to a spot where , though Socrates argument may not go by on been inf onlyible , it proves unassail adequate by that which was presented by Thrasymachus . Socrates achieves more or less consummate success in def go throughing Thrasymachus argument , and in so doing achieves a lower-level of success in defining the term justice , as he had set out to do . The success that Socrates finds is so relative , and contingent on the incident that where Thrasymachus was content derive and argue in the abstract , Socrates do his arguments more tha n concrete by substituting item cases . The specificity of Socrates arguments has the emolument of revealing the flaws native in the reasoning put forwards by Thrasymachus , and in that sense Socrates argument against him is successfulThrasymachus enters an argument begun by Socrates and Polemarchus by pick at their dialectic efforts and asserting his pretend claim that justice is equal solely in the collide with of the stronger entity This claim is a deterministic 1 that identifies the ability to birth the best with the right to de partd what whiz desires from that which has been subdued . Yet , the awkward and imprecise way in which it is phrased leaves Thrasymachus open to interpretations which he has not intend Socrates is immediately fitting to counteract this argument by embody it in the real-life situation of the pancratiast (wrestler ) whose need for strength requires that he tire beef (338 d . Socrates extension of Thrasymachus argument shows that it wo uld require that all men eat beef regardless! of their need for it only if because a stronger man necessity for the commodity dictates this . Thrasymachus cannot admit this specific treatment of the social function to be true , and is thence forced to modify his direction .

He says , That s abominable of you , Socrates you take hold of the argument in the way you can run it the most harm (338 e describing the method through which Socrates is able to confound his argument . In disproving an argument or both possible action , Socrates knows that one has save to find one special case in which the theory does not fall in . He uses this knowledge to his ad vantage in succeeding against Thrasymachus , who should ease up detected these areas of inconsistency on his own before presenting his argumentPlato later on presents a second area in which Socrates is successful in his argument against Thrasymachus . Thrasymachus argues a trifle more specifically when he speaks of the different types of government and how each rules by making and enforcing laws . He emphasizes the standardisedity of their methods while acknowledging a battle in the types of government that turn up - yet without any evoke as to what might have caused such differing outcomes from such similar methods . Socrates pounces upon this weakness by embarking on a dialectical tour toward discovering precisely what...If you want to bunk a full essay, social club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper