Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing Essay -- essays research papers

Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing I would like to take this age to explain my position on Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing. I pull up stakes show both pros and cons for each topic, as well as prove you my personal brief on which one I support. There ar two types of plea messs The first one is a go against bargain. When the public prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge, or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant supercharged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary". A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving with License hang up may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the wino driving charge. The second plea bargain is when a defendant is told in advance what his convict will be if he pleads guilty. This can overhaul a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and i s afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargain.Sentence bargaining sometimes occurs in high profile cases where the prosecutor does not destiny to reduce the charges against the defendant, usually for fear of how the newspapers will react. A sentence bargain may allow the prosecutor to obtain a conviction to the most serious charge, while assuring the defendant of an a...